On the Performance Assessment and Comparison of Stochastic Multiobjective Optimizers

نویسندگان

  • Carlos M. Fonseca
  • Peter J. Fleming
چکیده

This work proposes a quantitative, non-parametric interpretation of statistical performance of stochastic multiobjective optimizers, including, but not limited to, genetic algorithms. It is shown that, according to this interpretation, typical performance can be defined in terms analogous to the notion of median for ordinal data, as can other measures analogous to other quantiles. Non-parametric statistical test procedures are then shown to be useful in deciding the relative performance of different multiobjective optimizers on a given problem. Illustrative experimental results are provided to support the discussion.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Quality Assessment of Pareto Set Approximations

This chapter reviews methods for the assessment and comparison of Pareto set approximations. Existing set quality measures from the literature are critically evaluated based on a number of orthogonal criteria, including invariance to scaling, monotonicity and computational effort. Statistical aspects of quality assessment are also considered in the chapter. Three main methods for the statistica...

متن کامل

Generalized Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Guided by Descent Directions

This paper proposes a generalized descent directions-guided multiobjective algorithm (DDMOA2). DDMOA2 uses the scalarizing fitness assignment in its parent and environmental selection procedures. The population consists of leader and non-leader individuals. Each individual in the population is represented by a tuple containing its genotype as well as the set of strategy parameters. The main nov...

متن کامل

Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review

An important issue in multiobjective optimization is the quantitative comparison of the performance of different algorithms. In the case of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms, the outcome is usually an approximation of the Pareto-optimal front, which is denoted as an approximation set, and therefore the question arises of how to evaluate the quality of approximation sets. Most popular are m...

متن کامل

Why Quality Assessment Of Multiobjective Optimizers Is Difficult

Quantitative quality assessment of approximations of the Pareto-optimal set is an important issue in comparing the performance of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Most popular are methods that assign each approximation set a vector of real numbers that reflect different aspects of the quality. In this study, we investigate this type of quality assessment from a theoretical point of view....

متن کامل

Some Multiobjective Optimizers are Better than Others

The No-Free-Lunch (NFL) theorems hold for general multiobjective fitness spaces, in the sense that, over a space of problems which is closed under permutation, any two algorithms will produce the same set of multiobjective samples. However, there are salient ways in which NFL does not generally hold in multiobjective optimization. Previously we have shown that a ‘free lunch’ can arise when comp...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996